Search for: All records

By providing a large gaseous volume for nuclear interactions while simultaneously recording the tracks of resulting reaction products, an active target serves as both a thick target and a detector. Once a reaction occurs, the emitted charged fragments strip electrons from the target gas along their path as they transverse the detector. Collection of these stripped electrons allow for detection of the product tracks. As beam intensity increases, the resulting ionization in the active target can significantly distort this collection of electrons. If left uncorrected, the resulting measurements could be wrong. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the space charge produced by heavy radioactive beams within the Active Target - Time Projection Chamber at Michigan State University. The beams are injected parallel to the electric field of the time projection chamber which is operated without a magnetic field for this experiment. We analyze the rate dependence of the space charge effects and demonstrate that they can be modeled and effectively corrected. 

Abstract Massive stars are a major source of chemical elements in the cosmos, ejecting freshly produced nuclei through winds and core-collapse supernova explosions into the interstellar medium. Among the material ejected, long-lived radioisotopes, such as⁶⁰Fe (iron) and²⁶Al (aluminum), offer unique signs of active nucleosynthesis in our galaxy. There is a long-standing discrepancy between the observed⁶⁰Fe/²⁶Al ratio by γ-ray telescopes and predictions from supernova models. This discrepancy has been attributed to uncertainties in the nuclear reaction networks producing⁶⁰Fe, and one reaction in particular, the neutron-capture on⁵⁹Fe. Here we present experimental results that provide a strong constraint on this reaction. We use these results to show that the production of⁶⁰Fe in massive stars is higher than previously thought, further increasing the discrepancy between observed and predicted⁶⁰Fe/²⁶Al ratios. The persisting discrepancy can therefore not be attributed to nuclear uncertainties, and points to issues in massive-star models.